Review

Inspect a change against its intended contract and report actionable findings.

Purpose

Inspect a change against its intended contract and report actionable findings.

Recommended

  • Prioritize correctness, regressions, security, and missing tests.
  • Tie each finding to a precise location and concrete impact.
  • Separate blocking defects from optional improvements.

Avoid

  • Summarizing the patch without evaluating it.
  • Reporting style preferences as correctness defects.

Prompt skeleton

Prompt skeleton — deterministic, no model call

Review target
[Name the change, files, or revision.]

Intended behavior
[Explain the contract this change should satisfy.]

Review priorities
[Focus on correctness, regressions, security, and missing tests.]

Output
[Report actionable findings with precise locations.]

From templates/review.md. Placeholders describe what to fill in; nothing here invents project facts.

Evidence

official
  • officialPull request reviews support line-specific feedback, suggested improvements, approval, and requests for changes before merge.
    Pull request reviews ↗

Sources